You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘SFA’ tag.

VR-BUG-WEBIn recent years line-of-business applications including accounting, human resources, manufacturing, sales and customer service have appeared in the cloud. Cloud -based software as a service (SaaS) has replaced on-premises applications that were previously part of ERP and CRM environments. They have helped companies become more efficient but have also introduced interoperability challenges between business processes. Their advantage is that cloud software can be rented, configured and used within a day or week. The disadvantage is that they don’t always connect with one another seamlessly, as they used to and when managed by a third party there is limited connectivity to integrate them.

Smooth interoperation is critical for business processes that use ERP. The hybrid computing approach to ERP was assessed by my colleague Robert Kugel, who identified the challenges in these early approaches to ERP in the cloud. As on-premises ERP, these applications were fully connected and integrated with process and data integration wired together through additional technologies. This configurability of ERP has been a large challenge and has led to failed implementations, as Robert noted.  Understanding the complexities of ERP today is key to coming up with a solution.

One of the most fundamental business processes in organizations is tracking an order to fulfillment. That needs to be connected without manual intervention for transactional efficiency and to ensure data, analytics and planning are available. In fact our next generation of finance analytics benchmark research finds that ERP is the second-most important source of data being analyzed, after spreadsheets, and is the first-ranked source in almost one-third (32%) of organizations. In the transition to cloud computing this has become more complex. Applications that support the order-to-fulfillment process, for example, are increasingly being used individually in cloud computing, and many are being mingled with on-premises applications that require integration and automation to avoid manual intervention.

To start, orders are created by sales. Sales opportunities are created and closed with products and services purchased by contract or electronically. These must be placed in an order management system through which the record can be used by a multitude of systems and processes. Purchasing and fulfillment details are moved into an invoice as part of a billing application, then entered into accounting and accounts receivable where it is managed to payment. Finance takes orders and consolidates them into reports, typically in a financial performance management system. The order is then provided to manufacturing or fulfillment applications which build and deliver products, then fulfilled through warehouse and distribution management. The customer name and order number is also placed into an application that handles support calls or deploys services.

This is the reality of business today. Many departments and individuals, with different applications, are needed to support orders, fulfillment and service. If these applications are not connected organizations have to perform manual intervention, re-enter data, or copy and paste, which not only wastes time and resources but can introduce errors. Half (56%) of organizations do the integration through spreadsheets or exporting data, with custom coding being second-most popular (for 39%), according to our business data in the cloud research. (I will leave HR applications and the supporting people component out of this process though they play a critical role as an enterprise resource to support the order-to-fulfillment process and are part of many ERP deployments.) In addition performing any level of business planning is not simple as data is needed to determine past performance and plan for the future.

There is no simple way to make all this efficient. It has historically been managed by ERP, usually through a single vendor’s application suite. Now businesses want it done in the cloud, either on-premises or through other cloud applications. Proper attention must be paid to the needs and competencies of the departments and business processes involved. Thus migration and transition to ERP are not simple, nor is building an application architecture that supports process and data efficiently. Assessment and planning are necessary to ensure that risks are addressed. Switching to a new ERP system in the cloud will still require an application architecture to maintain proper operations across departments and existing applications, whether they are on-premises, in a private cloud, in the public cloud or in a hybrid combination. This integration among sales force automation, customer service and other systems is outside the scope of most cloud ERP deployments who have not provided the most robust integration points for the applications and data.

Robert Kugel writes that ERP must take a giant leap in order to operate in the cloud. I agree. Our firm often gets requests for assistance in finding the right approach to ERP and business process. While midsize companies find ERP in the cloud increasingly attractive, there are significant challenges to adapting  and integrating such applications as part of business processes, which many customers overlook in their desire for a cloud-based solution. The majority of cloud ERP vendors have not provided integration and workflow of information from their applications to others in an open and seamless manner, complicating deployments and adding unexpected costs for customers.

vr_fcc_financial_close_and_automation_updatedERP suppliers moving from on-premises to cloud computing have acknowledged the complexities. Many of the legacy ERP vendors have struggled to enable application interoperability and the differing management requirements of IT and business. This struggle has resulted in a lack of confidence by organizations wishing to migrate to ERP in the cloud and makes them wonder whether to look at alternative approaches with individual applications using integration across them and data to support business processes. Automation is another major concern. The lack of it across business processes has impeded finance groups in closing the books efficiently; our research on the fast, clean close shows many organizations losing four or more days.

In the meantime technological advances in integration technologies that operate in the cloud computing environment can interconnect with on-premises systems. The ability to simultaneously distribute transactions and data across systems makes the ability to architect business processes and workflows a reality. For some organizations the use of business process management and other integration technology approaches are being adopted. The new technologies are able to blend into many applications, so that users do not know they are working on applications from different vendors, nor do they need to know. These advances enable application architecture to interoperate and automate the flow of data from on-premises and cloud computing environments, providing new opportunities to interoperate from ERP or other applications. Many organizations are doing this today, and more than one-third of companies are planning or need to move data from cloud to cloud, cloud to on-premises or on-premises to cloud, data according our business data in the cloud research.

No matter whether a company is in manufacturing or services, they must address the integration complexities to gain efficiency and support growth without adding more resources. While many new ERP providers in the cloud are taking simpler approaches from the applications interface to how it processes transactions, most have not learned the importance of integration to other systems and the need for accessing and integrating data for transactions and analytics. Having consistency of data across applications and systems is a major obstacle in more than one-fifth (21%) of organizations and a minor obstacle in two-fifths (43%), and they find similar difficulties in the complexities of accessing data, according to our business data in the cloud research. In addition they lack effective planning (which of course is the P in ERP), and reporting is less than sufficient and often must be complemented by third-party tools.

All this introduces yet more complexity for business and IT in determining how they can move forward with ERP in the cloud, adapting existing and new applications to interoperate.  The outlook for ERP in the cloud is thus uncertain. If these vendors do not adapt to the reality of what their customers want (as opposed to what they want their customers to do), it will remain cloudy. Responding to pressure to take an open approach that is easy to integrate, however, ERP providers could see a sunny forecast.

Regards,

Mark Smith

CEO & Chief Research Officer

Few sales organizations realize their full potential, partly because they don’t execute well. We urge organizations to move beyond conventional wisdom in how they think about executing sales vr_SF12_07_impediments_in_sales_motivate_investmentprocesses and have placed methods for making improvement to sales execution at the center of our research on sales in 2014. In our recent research on sales forecasting almost half (44%) of sales organizations said they have impediments that are motivating management to consider further investment in sales technology, and the most common of those is inconsistent execution (for 53%). Many sales organizations don’t use training in a consistent manner and fail to automate processes to gain efficiency.

Software provider Qvidian specializes in sales execution and has applications operating in a cloud environment and on mobile technology that help optimize sales processes and increase productivity of sales teams. The company has 15 years of experience in developing sales playbooks and proposal software, and more than 1,200 customers now use its applications in the cloud. Qvidian makes it a point to be adaptive in meeting the variety of needs of sales organizations across industries and sizes.

Its Sales Playbooks provide digital guidance to help users achieve the best results in an efficient manner. One of the products’ focuses is to make sales processes repeatable, which is critical to optimizing revenue across quotas and territories. The playbook approach also supports what we call collaborative coaching, which our recent research shows is a top focus for improving collaboration in the sales forecasting process. Qvidian’s approach can automate and guide the sales process.

The company also has introduced mobile support for its Sales Playbooks. Our research finds a need for that, as more than half (51%) of organizations already use tablets and another quarter (26%) plan to deploy them in the next 18 months. Qvidian supports its playbooks on the Apple iPad, which currently is the most widely used tablet in sales organizations. To further streamline the use of playbooks, Qvidian has user and functional integration with salesforce.com’s sales force automation software. The tight linkage enables triggering of actions based on rules for certain conditions. Qvidian’s independent approach to sales processes and systems fills a void in the SFA and CRM markets; its playbooks can run on any application commonly used in sales.

To know where improvement is needed and how achieve it, companies need insights derived from analytics applied to data from sales processes. Qvidian Sales Analytics enables users to create and track metrics and indicators that can point out inefficiencies to be addressed through coaching and guidance and to establish repeatability. Analytics is consistently rated by sales professionals in our research as the top new technology to help improve sales efforts. Qvidian’s sales analytics help managers identify where sales reps are not following the mandated process and suggest ways to help through using a playbook or a series of steps that are known to provide better results.

Qvidian offers other applications to help sales people be more efficient in the tedious tasks of preparing necessary documents and information. Qvidian Proposal Automation can help  a sales organization deliver consistent proposals. Proposal Automation also helps standardize requests for proposal and suggests responses that have been proven accurate and effective. It also helps add consistency to sales presentations by quickly generating useful slides. Professionals typically spend large amounts of time on tasks such as these that automation can make repeatable and consistent across a sales organization.

Qvidian’s customers range from large well-known brand names such as Aon, Office Depot and Prudential to smaller sales teams in technology companies such as inContact and Splunk. Making its sales applications available through cloud computing enables sales groups to deploy and use its software with little IT intervention and helps sales teams be self-sufficient in their sales processes. While many sales organizations still believe that sales force automation will address all their needs, we find that applications like those from Qvidian can help them operate more effectively and improve overall execution of sales processes. We recommend evaluating Qvidian if your organization is seeking to maximize sales productivity and gain consistent execution on the road to optimal results.

Regards,

Mark Smith

CEO & Chief Research Officer

Mark Smith – Twitter

Top Rated

Stats

  • 160,314 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 17,643 other followers

%d bloggers like this: